Not always – so, if you decide to divorce in another country, it is advisable to seek advice on the impact this could have on marriage contracts concluded in Britain. Pre-marital agreements, alimony and immigration assistance 7. Get financing to cover all expected legal fees. It is important to know that you may be responsible for the fees of lawyers who ask you for help in foreign jurisdictions. See the International Code of Ethics of the International Bar Association, Rule 19, which provides in part that “lawyers who appoint a foreign colleague to advise a case or cooperate in the handling of that case are responsible for the payment of the fees of the international head, unless there has been an express decision to the contrary.” Find out what fees each lawyer charges and how the lawyer expects to be paid. In some countries, fees are set by local law. You should establish a viable billing plan. Foreign lawyers may not be accustomed to including a description of the work done as part of the billing. Some foreign lawyers can expect to be paid in advance. Others may demand regular payments and refuse to continue until they are paid. Ask for an estimate of the hours and total costs of the work.
Highlight who is involved in the work and the fees charged by each participant. As far as property is concerned, marriage contracts are also not insurmountable. A Canadian court may, in certain circumstances, modify or even ignore an agreement, for example. B when an unforeseen, financially disabling or devastating event has occurred. Most Canadian provinces provide for judicial review of marriage contracts, but the standard of forensic audit varies from province to province:-Ontarios Family Law Act allows a court to annul a marriage contract or part of it where a party has not disclosed essential assets or liabilities, if one party has not understood the nature or consequences of the contract. or otherwise, in accordance with contract law. Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, Ch.F.3., Sec.
56 (4).-The Nova Scotia Matrimonial Law permits the non-application of a marriage contract where a provision is “ruthless, excessively harsh on a party or fraudulent.” Matrimonial Property Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 275, § 29. Saskatchewan allows a court to redistribute property where an interspusal contract was ruthless or grossly unfair at the time the contract was entered into. Family Property Act, s.S. 1997, chap. F-6.3, §24(2).-New Brunswick allows a court to disregard a provision of a marriage contract if the spouse has not received independent legal advice and the application of the provision was unfair. The Marital Property Act, S.N.B 1980, Chap.M-1.1, § 41.-British Columbias Family Relations Act states that even if there is a valid marriage contract, the court may redistribute property on the basis of equity.
. . .
